Timemore's Sculptor 78s and Sculptor 64s espresso grinders made a very good impression in our tests. In this video, we discuss both grinders in detail and highlight their respective strengths and weaknesses. Both Timemore Sculptor grinders are designed as single-dosing grinders . They are said to perform well as both espresso and filter grinders. We tested this for you. In the attached video, however, we only discuss espresso performance. We will dedicate another video to the topic of filter coffee.
A detailed test report will follow. Until then, we provide the particle distribution measurements and results underlying the test in this article.
Specialist dealer Timemore Sculptor
We search for specialist partners for you who we know offer good work and excellent service. We maintain close contact with the retailers. These are commission links. If you order through these links, it won't cost you any extra, but we receive a small commission, which we invest in new test equipment. For the Timemore Sculptor, we recommend Die Röster .
Particle distribution measurement and comparison
Comparing the particle distribution of the two grinders, we see that both have a very narrow and high main peak, which speaks to the grinders' clarity and precision. In fact, we've never measured such narrow main peaks before. At the same time, both grinders exhibit a pronounced fines content. This, in turn, is necessary to create sufficient resistance given the high homogeneity of the majority of the particles. In the case of the Timemore Sculptor 78s and Timemore Sculptor 64s, we found that both have a good mouthfeel due to the fine peak. The espresso extractions were not only very balanced and sweet, but also showcased the facets of the coffees used.
Rotations per minute (RPM)
Both grinders offer the option to adjust the speed of the grinding discs. This function is expressed in RPM (rotations per minute). We seized the opportunity and conducted some tests at different RPMs. We checked the extraction, particle distribution, and flavor.
The particle distribution measurements don't differ significantly. At a higher RPM of 1400 on the Timemore Sculptor 78s, we measured a slightly narrower main peak (10 microns) and a slightly higher fines content (1.4%). This fit the sensory picture, as the brews at higher RPM tasted clearer and more rounded.
We conducted our sensory assessment of the espresso grinders at the fastest RPM. Filter coffees tasted better at a lower RPM. We will publish a separate video review on this topic.
Conclusion Timemore Sculptor 78s and 64s
